Players have been debating whether the recently launched video game Dead Space will set a new standard for contemporary remakes.
While some people have expressed support for the proposal because of the upgraded graphics and gameplay as well as the compelling plot and atmosphere, others have expressed their concern because remakes frequently ruin the reputation of well-known brands.
The information was found in a developing post on the website Resetera. The original poster, SzymboraWisawska, stated, “I wanted to create a discussion about Dead Space as a remake and about video game remakes in a larger sense, especially horror game remakes. “Mainly due to the notion that this will now serve as the benchmark for modern remakes, which I observed echoed in numerous reviews.”
The remake is generally well received, although many gamers have expressed a wish for Dead Space to be handled carefully moving forward, especially if the sequels are subsequently redone. Remasters have even been argued to be superior to remakes in this specific instance.
Players have noted the necessity of comprehending the rationale behind the decision to remake a video game in the first place, which has generally centered the discussion on whether or not a replication represents a better option than a reinterpretation.
The Resident Evil 3 remake and even the Resident Evil 2 remake butchered some of the game’s defining elements; Dead Space introduces changes that help with strengthening these elements. “Dead Space isn’t a one-to-one remake that only settles for graphical updates, but it remains extremely faithful to its source material,” SzymboraWisawska said of the game.
SzymboraWisawska stated, “I have always had certain reservations about the new Resident Evil remakes. While I give Resident Evil 2 a nine out of ten and consider it to be a good remake, I still believe that some potential was lost in Resident Evil 3. In relation to Dead Space, SzymboraWisawska continued, “I wonder whether more people now” would begin to “look at Cap com’s work with a more critical eye.”
Read Next: